Refrigerated warehousing · California

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry

City of Industry, CA · ~55 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Refrigerated warehousing workplace, earning a grade B.

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry: 4.4 TCR = 76% of Refrigerated warehousing BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry safety composite

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry: 2.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2024

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry's TCR rose 1.6 from 2.0 in 2022 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · City of Industry, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.4 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #67/125
  • PHOTO Cheney Brothers - PSL
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cheney Brothers - PSL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry averages 4.4 TCR (76% of the Refrigerated warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry TCR series: 2022=2 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 5.8

Where Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry falls in its industry

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 125 Refrigerated warehousing employers in California.

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry (55 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry
Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry (55 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Americold Logistics, LLC: City of Industry has fewer employees than the Refrigerated warehousing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2023 7.6 5.7 4 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · CA · City of Industry

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 226 employers in City of Industry, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cheney Brothers - PSL 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lineage Logistics Boonville 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RLS Logistics - Cold Storage 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisa County Freezer 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FARMING ADMINISTRATION 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dwelley Family Farms LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Valley Vineyard Management 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Certified Vineyard 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morrow-Meadows Corporation 1,879 FTE
CITY-NEAR 050109-INDUSTRY CA P&DC 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR INDUSTRY_1441491 704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kellwood Apparel, LLC 489 FTE
NAT-TCR FedEx Supply Chain Hixson 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR H04 - Distribution International 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fayette Janitorial LLC- Golden State 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Northshore Heights 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westlake Woods by New Perspective 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hz Snf LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kls Frito Lay Fl 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE 62F5 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.