Manufacturer of industrial fans · Ohio

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc

Cincinnati, OH · ~25 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc runs at 202% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Manufacturer of industrial fans workplace, earning a grade F.

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc: 6.7 TCR = 202% of Manufacturer of industrial fans BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc safety composite

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.9

2018→2024

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc injury rate improved

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc's TCR fell 13.9 from 13.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.9 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 202% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/12
  • PHOTO PPA Industries, Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PPA Industries, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc averages 6.7 TCR (202% of the Manufacturer of industrial fans BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc TCR series: 2018=13.9 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc falls in its industry

232 Manufacturer of industrial fan establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 12 Manufacturer of industrial fan employers in Ohio.

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc (25 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc
Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc (25 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc has fewer employees than the Manufacturer of industrial fans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.5 4.3 2 0 0
2022 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 8.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 13.9 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · OH · Cincinnati

232 Manufacturer of industrial fans employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PPA Industries, Inc 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poynette Plant 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austin Air Systems, Limited 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Excelsior Blower Systems, Inc. 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rittman Orchards 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Convoy Dairy LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kalmbach Swine Management 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nature Pure Farm 2 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Wipes International 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Weir's Furniture Village, Inc. - Southlake 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GCP Laboratories Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Vestas Nacelles America, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chris Greene Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE MARSHES 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chosen Wood Window Maintenance 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Signode Angleboard 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.