Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing · New York

Austin Air Systems, Limited

Buffalo, NY · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Austin Air Systems, Limited runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Austin Air Systems, Limited: 6.8 TCR = 205% of Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Austin Air Systems, Limited safety composite

Austin Air Systems, Limited scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2017→2024

Austin Air Systems, Limited injury rate improved

Austin Air Systems, Limited's TCR fell 3.6 from 8.4 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=15.8 · 2022=14.8 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Buffalo, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 205% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO Poynette Plant
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Poynette Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Austin Air Systems, Limited in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Austin Air Systems, Limited averages 6.8 TCR (205% of the Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Austin Air Systems, Limited TCR series: 2017=8.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=15.8 · 2022=14.8 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Austin Air Systems, Limited falls in its industry

232 Air purification equipment, st establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Air purification equipment, st employers in New York.

Austin Air Systems, Limited (52 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Austin Air Systems, Limited
Austin Air Systems, Limited (52 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Austin Air Systems, Limited has fewer employees than the Air purification equipment, stationary, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2023 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 14.8 1.5 10 0 0
2021 15.8 9.1 7 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.4 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · NY · Buffalo

232 Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 532 employers in Buffalo, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Poynette Plant 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PPA Industries, Inc 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americraft Manufacturing Co., Inc 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greeheck Fan 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care, NY, LLC.-Riverhead 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE KW NJ, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMC 3 City Center 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookfield Renewable - Hudson 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buffalo General Hospital 3,556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital of Buffalo 2,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR WNY Independent Living, Inc. 1,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaleida Health Oishei Childrens Hospital 1,765 FTE
NAT-TCR Delta Air Lines - MEM 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Stucco of Arizona Inc 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Farm and Fleet of Belvidere 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DLT6 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ocean Springs Lumber Company 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chipmatic, Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE AJM Packaging - Fullerton 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Century Group Inc 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.