Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Texas

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109

Dallas, TX · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 runs at 295% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109: 8.6 TCR = 295% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 safety composite

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2018→2021

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 injury rate improved

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109's TCR fell 6.2 from 10.7 in 2018 to 4.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.7 · 2019=10.4 · 2021=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 295% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #318/327
  • PHOTO Reynolds Restoration…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reynolds Restoration Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 averages 8.6 TCR (295% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 TCR series: 2018=10.7 · 2019=10.4 · 2021=4.5 · BLS 2.9

Where Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #318 safest of 327 Construction management, comme employers in Texas.

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 (35 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109
Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 (35 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 has fewer employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 10.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 10.7 8.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TX · Dallas

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reynolds Restoration Services, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DC Building Systems, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RMD Manufacturing, LTD 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valor Contracting 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR J. Walter Miller Company 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Simi Hills 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MultiCare Valley Hospital (Company 22) 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 355570-Mount Sinai Po 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Focus Health (San Jose) 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vaughn's Plumbing & Heating Co. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Installed Building Products of Memphis #742 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apple Valley Insulation (BDI) #893 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.