Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · New York

DC Building Systems, Inc.

Watertown, NY · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DC Building Systems, Inc. runs at 295% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

DC Building Systems, Inc.: 8.6 TCR = 295% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DC Building Systems, Inc. safety composite

DC Building Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DC Building Systems, Inc.: 4.8 → 12.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 12.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2017

DC Building Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 7.6 from 4.8 in 2016 to 12.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Watertown, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 295% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #204/218
  • PHOTO Reynolds Restoration…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reynolds Restoration Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

DC Building Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DC Building Systems, Inc. averages 8.6 TCR (295% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DC Building Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=12.3 · BLS 2.9

Where DC Building Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #204 safest of 218 Addition, alteration and renov employers in New York.

DC Building Systems, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate DC Building Systems, Inc.
DC Building Systems, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

DC Building Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 12.3 9.3 4 0 0
2016 4.8 4.8 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NY · Watertown

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 115 employers in Watertown, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reynolds Restoration Services, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ameritech Dallas TX 108, 109 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RMD Manufacturing, LTD 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valor Contracting 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spruce Haven Farm, LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora-Oakwood Dairy, LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eldred Brothers / Main Farm 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanehan Family Dairy, LLC 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samaritan Medical Center 1,735 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Arc Jefferson-St Lawrence NY 1,264 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAR-FRESHNER Corporation 430 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1871 381 FTE
NAT-TCR 0380 - Moreno Valley, Ca 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Loxley (Allox) 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Store #113 (Lacey, WA) 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PYC 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Bloomfield LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 120 Rider Avenue PCH Operating Company, LP 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyline Surgery Center 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.