Grading construction sites · Pennsylvania

Ameron Construction Co Inc.

State College, PA · ~59 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ameron Construction Co Inc. runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Grading construction sites workplace, earning a grade C.

Ameron Construction Co Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 83% of Grading construction sites BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ameron Construction Co Inc. safety composite

Ameron Construction Co Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ameron Construction Co Inc. held a steady TCR band

Ameron Construction Co Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · State College, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #45/115
  • PHOTO M&H Contractors, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M&H Contractors, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Ameron Construction Co Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ameron Construction Co Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (83% of the Grading construction sites BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ameron Construction Co Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Ameron Construction Co Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Grading construction sites establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 115 Grading construction sites employers in Pennsylvania.

Ameron Construction Co Inc. (59 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ameron Construction Co Inc.
Ameron Construction Co Inc. (59 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Ameron Construction Co Inc. has more employees than the Grading construction sites median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 3.3 1.7 1 1 0
2018 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2017 8.1 4.0 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · PA · State College

1,750 Grading construction sites employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 148 employers in State College, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M&H Contractors, LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bryan & Sons Lawn & Landscape LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois Civil Contractors, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Larry Brown Excavating 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Creek Nurseries, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eddystone Generating Station 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&A Homes, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Nittany Medical Center 1,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans State College 098 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2230 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2230 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Golden Gate Constructors 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Prevost - Winter Garden, FL 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Delmar Products 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Staff Electric Comany, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 8015 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1159 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chatsworth Products Co. Round Rock, TX 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE SBS Houston 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.