Saws, hand, nonpowered, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC)

Carlisle, PA · ~46 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Saws, hand, nonpowered, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC): 6.3 TCR = 191% of Saws, hand, nonpowered, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) safety composite

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC): 1.9 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 11.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC)'s TCR rose 6.4 from 1.9 in 2021 to 8.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332216 · Carlisle, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 191% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO Western Forge, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Western Forge, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) averages 6.3 TCR (191% of the Saws, hand, nonpowered, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) TCR series: 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) falls in its industry

174 Saws, hand, nonpowered, manufa establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Saws, hand, nonpowered, manufa employers in Pennsylvania.

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) (46 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC)
Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) (46 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Ames Center for Digital Commerce (ACDC) has fewer employees than the Saws, hand, nonpowered, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 5.6 3 0 0
2023 11.3 11.3 5 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332216 · PA · Carlisle

174 Saws, hand, nonpowered, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 165 employers in Carlisle, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Western Forge, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Channellock Inc. Plant 2 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rock Island, IL 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jeffrey Machine 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Needham's Mushroom Farms, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Pride Inc / Bell & Evans Hatchery 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Casing, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Elizabethtown ELI1 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp Office Carlisle PA 1,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR DB Schenker--Carlisle 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCM 984 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACAS - CARLISLE 902 FTE
NAT-TCR PF MPW SNF Ops, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliance RV, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherry Hospital 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ravenswood Studio Inc 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Koenig Equipment- Greensburg, IN 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simile Construction Service, Inc 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glunt Industries Plant 4 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Higley 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.