Distribution of electric power · Georgia

Amicalola Emc- Hdq

Jasper, GA · ~101 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amicalola Emc- Hdq runs at 482% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Amicalola Emc- Hdq: 5.8 TCR = 482% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amicalola Emc- Hdq safety composite

Amicalola Emc- Hdq scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2017→2024

Amicalola Emc- Hdq injury rate improved

Amicalola Emc- Hdq's TCR fell 4.4 from 8.0 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.0 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Jasper, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 482% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #108/149
  • PHOTO Brunswick Operating …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brunswick Operating and Transmission Maintenance Center - 3951 & 3915 Community Rd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Amicalola Emc- Hdq in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amicalola Emc- Hdq averages 5.8 TCR (482% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amicalola Emc- Hdq TCR series: 2017=8 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Amicalola Emc- Hdq falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 149 Distribution of electric power employers in Georgia.

Amicalola Emc- Hdq (101 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Amicalola Emc- Hdq
Amicalola Emc- Hdq (101 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Amicalola Emc- Hdq has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 0.0 4 0 0
2023 4.6 0.9 4 1 0
2022 4.6 0.9 3 2 0
2021 6.6 3.8 7 0 0
2020 4.8 1.9 5 0 0
2019 6.8 3.9 4 3 0
2018 7.3 4.2 6 1 0
2017 8.0 4.0 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · GA · Jasper

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 25 employers in Jasper, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brunswick Operating and Transmission Maintenance Center - 3951 & 3915 Community Rd. 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LADWP 201 WEBSTER 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GMP General Service Center - Poultney 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain Electric Coop Newland 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Edwards, MS 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amec Foster Wheeler MOS Group 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Affinity Building Systems 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR JASPER 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Mountainside Hospital 501 FTE
CITY-NEAR Royston LLC 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Royston LLC - Jasper, GA 266 FTE
NAT-TCR Hilltown Packing Co., Inc.-CA 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TPI Humacao 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Zero Zone, Inc.-Waukesha 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Snohomish County Government 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elementary 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bearse Manufacturing Co 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0006 Santa Monica 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0159 Spokane 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.