Electric power distribution systems · Georgia

Amicalola Emc- Ndo

Ellijay, GA · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amicalola Emc- Ndo runs at 556% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Amicalola Emc- Ndo: 6.7 TCR = 556% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amicalola Emc- Ndo safety composite

Amicalola Emc- Ndo scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2017→2024

Amicalola Emc- Ndo injury rate improved

Amicalola Emc- Ndo's TCR fell 9.6 from 9.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.6 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Ellijay, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 556% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #122/149
  • PHOTO Linn County Rural El…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Amicalola Emc- Ndo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amicalola Emc- Ndo averages 6.7 TCR (556% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amicalola Emc- Ndo TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Amicalola Emc- Ndo falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #122 safest of 149 Electric power distribution sy employers in Georgia.

Amicalola Emc- Ndo (31 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Amicalola Emc- Ndo
Amicalola Emc- Ndo (31 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Amicalola Emc- Ndo has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.7 0.0 2 2 0
2021 9.3 0.0 2 1 0
2020 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2019 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2018 10.2 6.8 2 1 0
2017 9.6 6.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · GA · Ellijay

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 23 employers in Ellijay, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Linn County Rural Electric Cooperative 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austell Operating - 2525 Old Alabama Rd. Austell 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augusta Operating - 2103 North Leg Drive 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asheboro Office 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wade Plantation LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clover Leaf Gin Inc. Georgia 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birdsong Peanuts Arlington Georgia 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton GA 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pilgrim's Pride Processing Plant 829 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMS 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellijay Telephone 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitepath Fab Tech 156 FTE
NAT-TCR S04013 - WM of TN - Jackson 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Felt Plant 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hiawatha 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookings Grocery Outlet 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Culligan - Waukesha 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fd Cif 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE RAS Process Equipment 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE District Wide 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.