Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing · New Jersey

RAS Process Equipment

Robbinsville, NJ · ~31 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RAS Process Equipment runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

RAS Process Equipment: 2.5 TCR = 76% of Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RAS Process Equipment safety composite

RAS Process Equipment scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2017→2024

RAS Process Equipment injury rate improved

RAS Process Equipment's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332410 · Robbinsville, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO NobelClad
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NobelClad (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

RAS Process Equipment in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RAS Process Equipment averages 2.5 TCR (76% of the Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RAS Process Equipment TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where RAS Process Equipment falls in its industry

171 Aftercoolers (i.e., heat excha establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Aftercoolers (i.e., heat excha employers in New Jersey.

RAS Process Equipment (31 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate RAS Process Equipment
RAS Process Equipment (31 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.9

RAS Process Equipment has fewer employees than the Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2020 6.9 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332410 · NJ · Robbinsville

171 Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 45 employers in Robbinsville, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NobelClad 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Boiler Technologies, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gaspar Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamon Deltak, Inc 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Orsted - Newark 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beacon Construction Services 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neelam Construction Corp 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spiniello Companies - Livingston 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR4 4,514 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - EWR4 3,738 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - PNE5 1,743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Robbinsville, NJ - 03 610 FTE
NAT-TCR ITW Pro Brands 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR JSR - Sunnyvale 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 341 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SiteOne Landscape Supply #173 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fd Cif 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Culligan - Waukesha 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amicalola Emc- Ndo 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pueblo Del Rio 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.