Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Connecticut

AMK Welding

South Windsor, CT · ~47 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMK Welding runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

AMK Welding: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMK Welding safety composite

AMK Welding scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2019→2024

AMK Welding injury rate improved

AMK Welding's TCR fell 1.0 from 4.8 in 2019 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.8 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · South Windsor, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #20/54
  • PHOTO Hanwha Aerospace USA…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

AMK Welding in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMK Welding averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMK Welding TCR series: 2019=4.8 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.3

Where AMK Welding falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 54 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Connecticut.

AMK Welding (47 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate AMK Welding
AMK Welding (47 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

AMK Welding has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 4.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · CT · South Windsor

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 117 employers in South Windsor, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williams International 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain Lynn MA 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Aerospace USA - Glastonbury 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lindy Farms 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Danielson Elec 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penna Construction (aka: A.J. Penna & Son Construction) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105603 - 155.7MW Gravel Pit CT Solar 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1223 Swn1000 630 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZSWN 579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broadridge Customer Communications, LLC 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR New England Mechanical Services, Inc. 413 FTE
NAT-TCR Worthen Industries Nashua South 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Discovery Wall Systems, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AC Tempe 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Templeton Elementary 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ahern Twin Cities 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Steel Crane & Rigging LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chuckran Auto Parts 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compleat Stair Kennesaw GA 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.