Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Connecticut

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire

Cheshire, CT · ~262 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire safety composite

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2022→2024

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire injury rate improved

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.1 in 2022 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.1 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Cheshire, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #21/54
  • PHOTO Hanwha Aerospace USA…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~262 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hanwha Aerospace USA - Glastonbury (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 54 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Connecticut.

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire (262 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire
Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire (262 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Hanwha Aerospace USA - Cheshire has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2023 5.1 2.5 14 0 0
2022 2.1 1.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · CT · Cheshire

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 68 employers in Cheshire, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Aerospace USA - Glastonbury 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMK Welding 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AVMATS Engine Support 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New England Aifoil Products 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sysco 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelton 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linde Headquarters 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allegion Access Technologies 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bozzuto's Inc. 1,617 FTE
CITY-NEAR 88500 1,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cheshire Corectional Institution 440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cheshire 385 FTE
NAT-TCR AluChem of Jackson 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Beaumont 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 22-24 West 15th Street 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Triad Manufacturing, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bop LLC - Msn5 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renewal - Redmond 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE Astral Industries 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercer Transportation Co., Inc. 262 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.