Belt conveyor systems manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC

Reading, PA · ~96 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Belt conveyor systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC: 4.0 TCR = 122% of Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC safety composite

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC: 2.7 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2024

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC's TCR rose 2.8 from 2.7 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 122% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO Container Handling S…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Container Handling Systems Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC averages 4.0 TCR (122% of the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=3.2 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC falls in its industry

361 Belt conveyor systems manufact establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Belt conveyor systems manufact employers in Pennsylvania.

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC (96 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC
Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC (96 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC has more employees than the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 5.5 5 0 0
2022 3.2 2.4 4 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 5.6 4.5 5 0 0
2019 5.5 4.1 4 0 0
2018 4.9 4.9 4 0 0
2016 2.7 1.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · PA · Reading

361 Belt conveyor systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Container Handling Systems Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dematic - Griffin 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Industries- Fesco/SE Division 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martin Sprocket & Gear 18 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Longenecker's Hatchery, Inc. 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardmore PA 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zartman 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE G W Peoples Contracting Co., Inc. 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Home Health Care Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR International Cellulose Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lindquist Machine Corp 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkdale Mills, Inc Plant 32-35 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Auburn 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITW Appliance Components 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linfor, Inc 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boeing Distribution Services Inc. - Chandler, AZ 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.