Belt conveyor systems manufacturing · Illinois

Container Handling Systems Corporation

Countryside, IL · ~40 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Container Handling Systems Corporation runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Belt conveyor systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Container Handling Systems Corporation: 4.0 TCR = 122% of Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Container Handling Systems Corporation safety composite

Container Handling Systems Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Container Handling Systems Corporation: 5.7 → 116.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 116.3 TCR · DART/TCR 28.78× in 2024

Container Handling Systems Corporation's TCR rose 110.6 from 5.7 in 2018 to 116.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 28.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · Countryside, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 122% of ind

  • DART 116.3 DART
  • RANK #10/15
  • PHOTO Ammeraal Beltech Mod…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Container Handling Systems Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Container Handling Systems Corporation averages 4.0 TCR (122% of the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Container Handling Systems Corporation TCR series: 2018=5.7 · 2019=2.4 · 2024=116.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Container Handling Systems Corporation falls in its industry

361 Belt conveyor systems manufact establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 15 Belt conveyor systems manufact employers in Illinois.

Container Handling Systems Corporation (40 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Container Handling Systems Corporation
Container Handling Systems Corporation (40 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Container Handling Systems Corporation has fewer employees than the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 116.3 116.3 1 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 5.7 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · IL · Countryside

361 Belt conveyor systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 31 employers in Countryside, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ammeraal Beltech Modular LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dematic - Griffin 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Industries- Fesco/SE Division 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martin Sprocket & Gear 18 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Gas Integrity Management 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Bloomington Reporting Center 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Downers Grove Sanitary District 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Window Works Addison 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vee Pak, LLC dba Voyant Beauty 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vee Pak - Countryside, IL 514 FTE
CITY-NEAR Helping Hand Center 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000003154 185 FTE
NAT-TCR Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Herrema Dairy LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 06065-06-06-FONTANA 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE BAE Kingsport 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roof Technologies LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bridge at Orlando 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colton 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.