Construction management, multifamily building · California

AMPAM Parks Mechanical

Carson, CA · ~965 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMPAM Parks Mechanical runs at 257% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, multifamily building workplace, earning a grade F.

AMPAM Parks Mechanical: 9.8 TCR = 257% of Construction management, multifamily building BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMPAM Parks Mechanical safety composite

AMPAM Parks Mechanical scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AMPAM Parks Mechanical: 4.0 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 24.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2022

AMPAM Parks Mechanical's TCR rose 2.2 from 4.0 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 24.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236116 · Carson, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 257% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #53/68
  • PHOTO West Coast Drywall &…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 367 inj
  • SIZE ~965 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Coast Drywall & Paint (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

AMPAM Parks Mechanical in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMPAM Parks Mechanical averages 9.8 TCR (257% of the Construction management, multifamily building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMPAM Parks Mechanical TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=24.2 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=13.7 · 2022=6.2 · BLS 3.8

Where AMPAM Parks Mechanical falls in its industry

410 Construction management, multi establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 68 Construction management, multi employers in California.

AMPAM Parks Mechanical (965 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate AMPAM Parks Mechanical
AMPAM Parks Mechanical (965 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6

AMPAM Parks Mechanical has more employees than the Construction management, multifamily bui median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.2 6.0 43 0 0
2021 13.7 12.6 88 13 0
2020 7.3 4.8 65 14 0
2018 24.2 13.7 99 0 0
2017 3.2 1.9 31 0 0
2016 4.0 3.0 41 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236116 · CA · Carson

410 Construction management, multifamily building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 236 employers in Carson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Coast Drywall & Paint 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schemel Companies, Inc. 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Shoals Construction 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mayor Construction LLC 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAMARILLO HARVESTING LP 965 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Electric Group 965 FTE
STATE-SIZE State of California - 048 965 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2032-08680101 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Refinery Carson 1,083 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Carson 755 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZCRS 686 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01601 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-01977 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 247412-South Easton Po 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 0652 - Minneapolis Mn Bus Ctr 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHI Health Saint Elizabeth 965 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Sheboygan Memorial Medical Center 965 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific 965 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Methodist Clear Lake Hospital (Nassau Bay, TX) 965 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.