Brake and brake parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · California

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson

Carson, CA · ~1,190 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Brake and brake parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson: 2.9 TCR = 54% of Brake and brake parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson safety composite

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2018→2020

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson injury rate improved

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson's TCR fell 2.5 from 4.5 in 2018 to 2.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336340 · Carson, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 54% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO TI Fluid Systems
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~1,190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TI Fluid Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson averages 2.9 TCR (54% of the Brake and brake parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson TCR series: 2018=4.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2 · BLS 5.4

Where Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson falls in its industry

133 Brake and brake parts, automot establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Brake and brake parts, automot employers in California.

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson (1,190 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson
Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson (1,190 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Centric Parts (PEO) - Carson has more employees than the Brake and brake parts, automotive, truck median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2019 2.2 0.4 5 0 0
2018 4.5 3.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336340 · CA · Carson

133 Brake and brake parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 236 employers in Carson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TI Fluid Systems 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TI GROUP AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS CARTERSVILLE 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piston Automotive 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bendix Spicer Foundation Brake, LLC - Kalamazoo 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Red Hawk Casino 1,190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chevron Richmond Refinery 1,191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nutanix-San Jose CA 1,189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monster Energy Company Rialto Warehouse 1,188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Refinery Carson 1,083 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMPAM Parks Mechanical 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Carson 755 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZCRS 686 FTE
NAT-TCR Universal Forest Products plant 380 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SD Orrville LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Shutters 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Intelligrated now part of Honeywell-Danville Facility 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ascentria Community Care IHC 1,190 FTE
NAT-SIZE GOJO Lippman Campus 1,190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunroc Corporation 1,190 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Solar Perrysburg 1,190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.