Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing · South Carolina

Amsted Rail Greenville

Name: Amsted Rail Greenville Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Fountain Inn, SC · ~112 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amsted Rail Greenville runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Amsted Rail Greenville: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amsted Rail Greenville safety composite

Amsted Rail Greenville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2017→2019

Amsted Rail Greenville injury rate improved

Amsted Rail Greenville's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.6 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336510 · Fountain Inn, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #6/7
PHOTO CRRC MA Corporation …
BOOK 3y book
INJ 11 inj
SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CRRC MA Corporation Springfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.5
CRRC MA Corpor

3.5
Decoursey KY C

3.5
Snyder Equipme

3.5
Oak Creek

3.5

What this shows Amsted Rail Greenville averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Amsted Rail Greenville TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Amsted Rail Greenville falls in its industry

208 Brakes and parts for railroad establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Brakes and parts for railroad employers in South Carolina.

Amsted Rail Greenville (112 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Amsted Rail Greenville has more employees than the Brakes and parts for railroad rolling st median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2019	0.0	0.0	0
2018	5.9	0.0	6
2017	4.6	2.8	5

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336510 · SC · Fountain Inn

208 Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 42 employers in Fountain Inn, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	CRRC MA Corporation Springfield	SPRINGFIELD, MA	3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Decoursey KY Car Shop	COVINGTON, KY	3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Snyder Equipment Co	NIXA, MO	3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Oak Creek	OAK CREEK, WI	3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Bethune	BETHUNE	112 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CFE Management, LLC	ORANGEBURG	112 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Sage Automotive Interiors Sharon Plant	ABBEVILLE	112 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Cox Industries-Corporate	ORANGEBURG	112 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Bosch Rexroth FniP	Fountain Inn	957 FTE
CITY-NEAR	DC/FniP Fountain Inn	Fountain Inn	900 FTE
CITY-NEAR	AVX Corporation	Fountain Inn	684 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Fountain Inn	Fountain Inn	655 FTE
NAT-TCR	Reduction Engineering Scheer	Kent, OH	3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	US NV Fernley Plant	Fernley, NV	3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Maxwell Milling of Indiana	Hagerstown, IN	3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Safety Harbor	Safety Harbor, FL	3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Wilson Excavating & Grading Inc.	New Wilmington, PA	112 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Vita Food Products, Inc.	Chicago, IL	112 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Village of South Elgin	South Elgin, IL	112 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Countryside Health & Living	Anderson, IN	112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.