Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Pennsylvania

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation

York, PA · ~147 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation runs at 369% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation: 12.2 TCR = 369% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation safety composite

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation: 8.6 → 15.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2023

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation's TCR rose 6.6 from 8.6 in 2016 to 15.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · York, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.2 · 369% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #24/27
  • PHOTO UniMetal Naugatuck
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 109 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UniMetal Naugatuck (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMZ Manufacturing Corporation averages 12.2 TCR (369% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=14.4 · 2020=12.9 · 2022=14.1 · 2023=15.2 · BLS 3.3

Where AMZ Manufacturing Corporation falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 27 Electroplating metals and form employers in Pennsylvania.

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation (147 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AMZ Manufacturing Corporation
AMZ Manufacturing Corporation (147 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

AMZ Manufacturing Corporation has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 15.2 7.6 31 1 0
2022 14.1 6.5 28 0 0
2020 12.9 11.1 21 0 0
2019 14.4 11.0 13 4 0
2018 7.9 5.9 8 0 0
2016 8.6 6.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · PA · York

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 496 employers in York, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UniMetal Naugatuck 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Plating Company, Inc 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vision Pickling & Processing 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OPP 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lady Farms Inc, Pennsylvania 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mill Hall 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danella Construction Corporation of Pennsylvania 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cavan 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan York Hospital 4,886 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan Medical Group 4,293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wellspan Health 2,591 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Supply Chain (Target York) 1,875 FTE
NAT-TCR Tss - Wy 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Area Learning Center 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington-Kosciusko Elementary 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Vera Meineke Nature Center at Spring Valley 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE ACR Homes-main office 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE DATTCO - Middletown 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield #034 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.