Skilled nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center

Allentown, PA · ~147 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center runs at 229% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center: 14.9 TCR = 229% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center safety composite

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.0

2018→2019

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center injury rate improved

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center's TCR fell 12.0 from 20.9 in 2018 to 8.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=20.9 · 2019=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Allentown, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.9 · 229% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #663/754
  • PHOTO Generations at Regency
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Generations at Regency (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center averages 14.9 TCR (229% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center TCR series: 2018=20.9 · 2019=8.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #663 safest of 754 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Pennsylvania.

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center (147 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center
Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center (147 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Good Shepherd Home at Conrad W. Raker Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.8 6.4 10 1 0
2018 20.9 10.0 16 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Allentown

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 447 employers in Allentown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Generations at Regency 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkview Care Center 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheldon Nursing Care Facilities 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sarah Brayton Nursing Care Center 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lady Farms Inc, Pennsylvania 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mill Hall 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danella Construction Corporation of Pennsylvania 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cavan 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lehigh Valley Hospital 9,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1200SCC 6,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Main Campus 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 48042 1,728 FTE
NAT-TCR Portland (Mesca) 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fox Valley Electric 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 0008 - Escondido, Ca 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1168 LKQ Self Service Raleigh / 3951 Auto Parts Outlet 14.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE J Brand, Inc. 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elizabeth Detention 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE GoldenCorr Sheets, LLC 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glendale Heights, IL 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.