Electric Utility · Oklahoma

Anadarko HQ

Anadarko, OK · ~115 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anadarko HQ runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric Utility workplace, earning a grade A.

Anadarko HQ: 0.5 TCR = 38% of Electric Utility BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anadarko HQ safety composite

Anadarko HQ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2017

Anadarko HQ injury rate improved

Anadarko HQ's TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · Anadarko, OK AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO California Independe…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Independent System Operator (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Anadarko HQ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anadarko HQ averages 0.5 TCR (38% of the Electric Utility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anadarko HQ TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Anadarko HQ falls in its industry

263 Electric Utility establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Electric Utility employers in Oklahoma.

Anadarko HQ (115 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Anadarko HQ
Anadarko HQ (115 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Anadarko HQ has more employees than the Electric Utility median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · OK · Anadarko

263 Electric Utility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 10 employers in Anadarko, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Independent System Operator 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISO New England Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwest Tennessee EMC - Brownsville 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE OG&E-Muskogee Power Plant 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE RSM Development, Inc. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerson Pressure Management-Tulsa 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Tex Madill (Dump) 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 162 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR 162 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gold River Casino 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transmission and Distribution Services 89 FTE
NAT-TCR Orgill Corporate Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DNVRCOFO 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CN Sylmar 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CN Burlington 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Decatur County Health Care and Rehabilitation, Inc. 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avante at Wilson 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manchester Tank Crossville 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sulphur Springs (Txsul) 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.