Utility Company · California

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10

Pomona, CA · ~80 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility Company workplace, earning a grade A.

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10: 0.4 TCR = 37% of Utility Company BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 safety composite

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 held a steady TCR band

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · Pomona, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 37% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #3/69
  • PHOTO California Independe…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Independent System Operator (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 averages 0.4 TCR (37% of the Utility Company BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 1.2

Where CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 falls in its industry

263 Utility Company establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 69 Utility Company employers in California.

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 (80 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10
CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 (80 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

CA-Pomona TSD - SCE 10 has more employees than the Utility Company median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 0 1 0
2016 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · CA · Pomona

263 Utility Company employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in Pomona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Independent System Operator 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anadarko HQ 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwest Tennessee EMC - Brownsville 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lookout Center 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJJ HARVESTING 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&A - Huron - Farm 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacifc International Marketing 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilgenburg Greenhouses 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center 3,804 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 524 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy, Inc. - Pomona, CA 1,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Gabut - Base Development and Support Center 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials- HQ 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ideal Setech, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR IC Bus Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE STR0688 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Point of Clawson 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denver North Care Center LLC 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist-Segynecologic Oncology 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.