Materials recovery facilities (MRF) · California

Anaheim Post Collection

Anaheim, CA · ~219 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anaheim Post Collection runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Materials recovery facilities (MRF) workplace, earning a grade F.

Anaheim Post Collection: 5.7 TCR = 219% of Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anaheim Post Collection safety composite

Anaheim Post Collection scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2018→2024

Anaheim Post Collection injury rate improved

Anaheim Post Collection's TCR fell 8.0 from 11.0 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=8.0 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.7 · 219% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #24/45
  • PHOTO ZPR Farm 2
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 97 inj
  • SIZE ~219 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ZPR Farm 2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Anaheim Post Collection in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anaheim Post Collection averages 5.7 TCR (219% of the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anaheim Post Collection TCR series: 2018=11 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=8 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=1 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 2.6

Where Anaheim Post Collection falls in its industry

422 Materials recovery facilities establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 45 Materials recovery facilities employers in California.

Anaheim Post Collection (219 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Anaheim Post Collection
Anaheim Post Collection (219 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Anaheim Post Collection has more employees than the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.5 6 0 0
2023 4.6 1.5 9 0 0
2022 1.0 0.0 2 0 0
2021 6.2 4.6 15 0 0
2020 8.0 4.8 17 3 0
2019 5.8 4.7 16 0 0
2018 11.0 8.3 32 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · CA · Anaheim

422 Materials recovery facilities (MRF) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ZPR Farm 2 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tomra Western BICS 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Republic Services, Baton Rouge MRF 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viatek Solutions, Lawrenceville 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gilroy Location 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mellano & Company dba Mellano Enterprises SLR 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Garlic Company 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statewide Labor Corporation 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Hospice Care of South Carolina, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TXS005 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fister Distribution, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Globe Pipe Hanger Products, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 99 - McCook 219 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frey-Moss Structures Inc 219 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCS 219 FTE
NAT-SIZE Autodie 219 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.