Materials recovery facilities (MRF) · New York

Tomra Western BICS

Lancaster, NY · ~36 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tomra Western BICS runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Materials recovery facilities (MRF) workplace, earning a grade F.

Tomra Western BICS: 5.7 TCR = 219% of Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tomra Western BICS safety composite

Tomra Western BICS scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tomra Western BICS: 7.0 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2018

Tomra Western BICS's TCR rose 0.6 from 7.0 in 2016 to 7.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · Lancaster, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.7 · 219% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #16/25
  • PHOTO Anaheim Post Collect…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anaheim Post Collection (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Tomra Western BICS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tomra Western BICS averages 5.7 TCR (219% of the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tomra Western BICS TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=7.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Tomra Western BICS falls in its industry

422 Materials recovery facilities establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 25 Materials recovery facilities employers in New York.

Tomra Western BICS (36 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tomra Western BICS
Tomra Western BICS (36 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Tomra Western BICS has fewer employees than the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 7.6 7.6 3 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2016 7.0 4.7 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · NY · Lancaster

422 Materials recovery facilities (MRF) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 83 employers in Lancaster, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anaheim Post Collection 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ZPR Farm 2 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Republic Services, Baton Rouge MRF 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viatek Solutions, Lawrenceville 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CY Farms, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry W. Agle and Sons, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hansen Farms, LLC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Preble Hill Farms LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BUF5 1,188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF5 1,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erie Logistics 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF9 665 FTE
NAT-TCR Lutheran Home - Albemarle DBA Trinity Place 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GKN Emporium Automotive 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TVS-Interstate 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ocy - Nb Starr 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lex Rd 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE MaineGeneral Rehab & Long Term Care - Alzheimers Care Center 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Technologies 86 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.