Semiconductor devices manufacturing · California

Analog Devices Hillview Fab

Milpitas, CA · ~243 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Analog Devices Hillview Fab runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Semiconductor devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Analog Devices Hillview Fab: 3.7 TCR = 112% of Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Analog Devices Hillview Fab safety composite

Analog Devices Hillview Fab scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2022

Analog Devices Hillview Fab injury rate improved

Analog Devices Hillview Fab's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334413 · Milpitas, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 112% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #121/128
  • PHOTO 280 Great Valley Par…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~243 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 280 Great Valley Parkway (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Analog Devices Hillview Fab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Analog Devices Hillview Fab averages 3.7 TCR (112% of the Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Analog Devices Hillview Fab TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=4 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Analog Devices Hillview Fab falls in its industry

437 Semiconductor devices manufact establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #121 safest of 128 Semiconductor devices manufact employers in California.

Analog Devices Hillview Fab (243 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Analog Devices Hillview Fab
Analog Devices Hillview Fab (243 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Analog Devices Hillview Fab has more employees than the Semiconductor devices manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.1 2.3 7 0 0
2020 2.3 1.2 6 0 0
2019 4.0 2.6 11 0 0
2018 5.3 2.5 15 0 0
2017 2.3 1.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334413 · CA · Milpitas

437 Semiconductor devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 161 employers in Milpitas, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 280 Great Valley Parkway 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NXP ATMC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Q Cells USA, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR R&D Altanova 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CUPERTINO SERVICE CENTER & DE 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE DPR Construction - Sacramento 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Ana Creek Development 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tutor Perini/O&G Joint Venture PL2 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 454 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California 2,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA, MILPITAS 2,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR 011 SanDisk HQ 1,952 FTE
NAT-TCR Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Improveit Home Remodeling 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CIN-ODFL 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR OlympiaTech Electric 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE JM Oliver Inc 243 FTE
NAT-SIZE Klement Sausage Company, Inc. - Chase Plant 243 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Packaging - Golden Valley, MN 243 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fluidics Inc. 243 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.