Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing · Georgia

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc.

Gainesville, GA · ~87 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc.: 3.7 TCR = 112% of Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. safety composite

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 2.6 in 2020 to 2.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.6 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333241 · Gainesville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 112% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO GEA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GEA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. averages 3.7 TCR (112% of the Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. TCR series: 2020=2.6 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. falls in its industry

215 Grading, cleaning, and sorting establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Grading, cleaning, and sorting employers in Georgia.

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. (87 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc.
Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. (87 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. has more employees than the Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2021 5.9 4.7 3 2 0
2020 2.6 0.9 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333241 · GA · Gainesville

215 Grading, cleaning, and sorting machinery (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 306 employers in Gainesville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GEA 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gold Medal Products - Cincinnati 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stainless Systems, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marblehead Plant 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reidsville 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gwinnett District Jackson EMC 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flint River Mills- Truck Department 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flint River Mills- Mill Department 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. 5,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kubota Manufacturing of America Corporation 1,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poultry Processing 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Processing Plant 1,190 FTE
NAT-TCR Analog Devices Hillview Fab 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CIN-ODFL 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Improveit Home Remodeling 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR OlympiaTech Electric 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Surprise Office 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ariosa & Co. LLC 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baierl Subaru 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #566 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.