Hose assemblies for fluid power systems manufacturing · North Carolina

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro

Goldsboro, NC · ~147 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hose assemblies for fluid power systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Hose assemblies for fluid power systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro safety composite

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro: 0.0 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.38× in 2024

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro's TCR rose 1.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332912 · Goldsboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO RAM Aviation, Space …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RAM Aviation, Space & Defense (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anchor Coupling Goldsboro averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Hose assemblies for fluid power systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=2 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Anchor Coupling Goldsboro falls in its industry

182 Hose assemblies for fluid powe establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Hose assemblies for fluid powe employers in North Carolina.

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro (147 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Anchor Coupling Goldsboro
Anchor Coupling Goldsboro (147 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Anchor Coupling Goldsboro has more employees than the Hose assemblies for fluid power systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 4 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2021 2.5 1.6 3 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 1 0
2019 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332912 · NC · Goldsboro

182 Hose assemblies for fluid power systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 145 employers in Goldsboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RAM Aviation, Space & Defense 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Value Added Distributors - Fort Payne 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NOV Texas Oil Tools 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danfoss Power Solutions II, LLC 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Charlotte 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strategic Connections Inc 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emory Electric, Inc. 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE TW Garner Food Company 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cherry Hospital 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Wayne - All 966 FTE
CITY-NEAR O'Berry Neuro Medical Treatment Center 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR AP Emissions 422 FTE
NAT-TCR Real Alloy Recycling, LLC. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Mushroom Farms, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Brinkman Plumbing Contractors, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR KSH - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hale Ho'ola Hamakua 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carl Belt Inc. 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tpa Tampa International Airport 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Karn-Weadock Admin Building 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.