Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Anchor - Easton

Easton, PA · ~57 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anchor - Easton runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Anchor - Easton: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anchor - Easton safety composite

Anchor - Easton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Anchor - Easton injury rate improved

Anchor - Easton's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327331 · Easton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/15
  • PHOTO GMS Lawrenceville Di…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GMS Lawrenceville Distribution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Anchor - Easton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anchor - Easton averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anchor - Easton TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Anchor - Easton falls in its industry

321 Architectural block, concrete establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 15 Architectural block, concrete employers in Pennsylvania.

Anchor - Easton (57 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Anchor - Easton
Anchor - Easton (57 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Anchor - Easton has more employees than the Architectural block, concrete (e.g., flu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 1.9 0.0 1 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327331 · PA · Easton

321 Architectural block, concrete (e.g., fluted, ground face, screen, slump, split), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 182 employers in Easton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GMS Lawrenceville Distribution 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lone Butte 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oldcastle APG - Bonner Springs 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TEXAS BEST BLOCK - HOUB2 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE John R. Stinson & Sons Inc 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Leaf Medical LLC. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mt. Pleasant Egg 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mother Earth, LLC 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ABE4 1,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAFAYETTE COLLEGE 1,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Victaulic - Forks 1,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radial - Easton 2 1,181 FTE
NAT-TCR Omron Delta Tau Data Systems, Inc. (ODT) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hillsborough Community College 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Markle Residence 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR POTTER STRUCTURES, Ltd. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Wayland Baptist University 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale North Naples 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Human Resources 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maxcess - Tidland Keene NH 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.