Food Service Contractors · New York

Sodexo at Markle Residence

New York, NY · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Markle Residence runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Sodexo at Markle Residence: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Markle Residence safety composite

Sodexo at Markle Residence scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sodexo at Markle Residence held a steady TCR band

Sodexo at Markle Residence's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=6.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/524
  • PHOTO Horace Mann
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Horace Mann (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Markle Residence in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Markle Residence averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Markle Residence TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Markle Residence falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 524 Food Service Contractors employers in New York.

Sodexo at Markle Residence (25 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Markle Residence
Sodexo at Markle Residence (25 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Markle Residence has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.1 6.1 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · NY · New York

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Horace Mann 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT COKER UNIVERSITYRESIDENT DINI 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moorings Park Grande Lake 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT EMORY AND HENRY COLLEGE 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 242 Madava New York 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenwood dairy Farm LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scipio Springs Dairy 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hillsborough Community College 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Omron Delta Tau Data Systems, Inc. (ODT) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Anchor - Easton 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR POTTER STRUCTURES, Ltd. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at National Geographic Society 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Bensenville School District 2 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkersburg, Wv Branch 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston, Wv Branch 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.