Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants · Ohio

Anchor Hocking Plant 1

Lancaster, OH · ~701 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anchor Hocking Plant 1 runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Anchor Hocking Plant 1: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anchor Hocking Plant 1 safety composite

Anchor Hocking Plant 1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2020

Anchor Hocking Plant 1 injury rate improved

Anchor Hocking Plant 1's TCR fell 0.4 from 5.8 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327212 · Lancaster, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #6/12
  • PHOTO Libbey Toledo Plant
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 142 inj
  • SIZE ~701 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Libbey Toledo Plant (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Anchor Hocking Plant 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anchor Hocking Plant 1 averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anchor Hocking Plant 1 TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Anchor Hocking Plant 1 falls in its industry

75 Industrial glassware and glass establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 12 Industrial glassware and glass employers in Ohio.

Anchor Hocking Plant 1 (701 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Anchor Hocking Plant 1
Anchor Hocking Plant 1 (701 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Anchor Hocking Plant 1 has more employees than the Industrial glassware and glass products, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.5 3.2 31 0 0
2019 2.9 1.9 18 0 0
2018 5.1 4.7 27 0 0
2017 4.1 1.7 20 7 0
2016 5.8 3.2 46 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327212 · OH · Lancaster

75 Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 96 employers in Lancaster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Libbey Toledo Plant 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acuity Brands - Holophane Newark 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor Hocking 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quechee 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Memorial Health 701 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeastern Ohio Regional Medical Center. 701 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA Mfg Anderson 700 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogue Fitness 700 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Medical Center 2,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treehouse Foods, Lancaster OH 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3792 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3792 288 FTE
NAT-TCR 1967 VALULAND, Lansing, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Care Charlottesville 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Home City Ice Company - Washington Street - 240 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Middletown Branch 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greenville Plant 701 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dpd1 701 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dsd3 701 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6354-NY64 701 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.