Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants · Ohio

Libbey Toledo Plant

Toledo, OH · ~824 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Libbey Toledo Plant runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Libbey Toledo Plant: 4.6 TCR = 141% of Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Libbey Toledo Plant safety composite

Libbey Toledo Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2021

Libbey Toledo Plant injury rate improved

Libbey Toledo Plant's TCR fell 3.1 from 7.3 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327212 · Toledo, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 141% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #5/12
  • PHOTO Anchor Hocking Plant 1
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 188 inj
  • SIZE ~824 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anchor Hocking Plant 1 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Libbey Toledo Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Libbey Toledo Plant averages 4.6 TCR (141% of the Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Libbey Toledo Plant TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Libbey Toledo Plant falls in its industry

75 Industrial glassware and glass establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 12 Industrial glassware and glass employers in Ohio.

Libbey Toledo Plant (824 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Libbey Toledo Plant
Libbey Toledo Plant (824 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Libbey Toledo Plant has more employees than the Industrial glassware and glass products, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.2 3.4 26 0 0
2020 3.9 3.0 21 0 0
2019 4.8 3.1 36 5 0
2018 3.3 2.0 23 3 0
2017 4.5 3.0 33 4 0
2016 7.3 4.5 49 11 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327212 · OH · Toledo

75 Industrial glassware and glass products, pressed or blown, made in glass making plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 551 employers in Toledo, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anchor Hocking Plant 1 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acuity Brands - Holophane Newark 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor Hocking 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quechee 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE DMAX, Ltd. 824 FTE
STATE-SIZE OCLC, Inc. 824 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Products Inc. Valley City Site 824 FTE
STATE-SIZE BWX Technologies, Inc. Nuclear Operations Group - Barberton 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Assembly Complex 5,508 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Toledo Hospital 5,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Hospital 4,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Promedica Downtown Headquarters 3,308 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at General Mills-Main Loc Cafe 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Greater Austin Development 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aerc - 02 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Warm Springs Indian Head Casino 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE West 824 FTE
NAT-SIZE ascena Greencastle Fulfillment Center 824 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Arthur Jackson Company 824 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCBGILDD 824 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.