Telecommunications · South Carolina

ANCST - Charleston- SC

Name: ANCST - Charleston- SC Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

North Charleston, SC · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.7
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ANCST - Charleston- SC runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Telecommunications workplace, earning a grade C.

ANCST - Charleston- SC: 2.7 TCR = 95% of Telecommunications BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ANCST - Charleston- SC safety composite

ANCST - Charleston- SC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2018

ANCST - Charleston- SC injury rate improved

ANCST - Charleston- SC's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · North Charleston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 95% of ind

DART 0.3 DART
RANK #9/16
PHOTO Reed & Reed
BOOK 3y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reed & Reed (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.7
Reed & Reed

2.7
Dave's Constru

2.7
Tilson Technol

2.7
Clackams, OR O

2.7

What this shows ANCST - Charleston- SC averages 2.7 TCR (95% of the Telecommunications BLS benchmark).

ANCST - Charleston- SC TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=0.3 · BLS 2.8

Where ANCST - Charleston- SC falls in its industry

1,605 Telecommunications establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 16 Telecommunications employers in South Carolina.

ANCST - Charleston- SC (34 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

ANCST - Charleston- SC has fewer employees than the Telecommunications median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2018	0.3	0.3	1
2017	5.5	5.5	2
2016	2.2	0.0	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · SC · North Charleston

1,605 Telecommunications employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Reed & Reed	WOOLWICH, ME	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Dave's Construction, LLC	SIOUX FALLS, SD	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Tilson Technology Management, Inc. Henrietta	HENRIETTA, NY	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Clackams, OR Office CS	CLACKAMS, OR	2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	TLG TURF	BAMBERG	34 FTE
STATE-SIZE	ArborGen Inc. Headquarters	RIDGEVILLE	34 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Lancaster Operations Center	LANCASTER	34 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Marlboro Electric Cooperative Headquarters Office	BENNETTSVILLE	34 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Charleston County	North Charleston	2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Palmetto Goodwill Services	North Charleston	1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Trident Medical Center	North Charleston	1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SRC Charleston ISS Division	North Charleston	815 FTE
NAT-TCR	Oldcastle OPI - Loveland	Loveland, CO	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Madison Cs Hotel Group LLC.	Madison, WI	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Pratt Whitney Operations (Gatla)	Atlanta, GA	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	0466 - Lake Park, Fl	Lake Park, FL	2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	ANALP - Alpharetta- GA	Alpharetta, GA	34 FTE
NAT-SIZE	PT507 - Union,NJ	Union, NJ	34 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Legends - Oklahoma Thunder	Oklahoma City, OK	34 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Vero Beach Office	Vero Beach, FL	34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.