Cellular phone tower construction · Oregon

Clackams, OR Office CS

Name: Clackams, OR Office CS Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Clackams, OR · ~65 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.7
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clackams, OR Office CS runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cellular phone tower construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Clackams, OR Office CS: 2.7 TCR = 95% of Cellular phone tower construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clackams, OR Office CS safety composite

Clackams, OR Office CS scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2021

Clackams, OR Office CS injury rate improved

Clackams, OR Office CS's TCR fell 0.4 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Clackams, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 95% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #16/28
PHOTO Reed & Reed
BOOK 5y book
INJ 10 inj
SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reed & Reed (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.7
Reed & Reed

2.7
Dave's Constru

2.7
Tilson Technol

2.7
ANCST - Charle

2.7

What this shows Clackams, OR Office CS averages 2.7 TCR (95% of the Cellular phone tower construction BLS benchmark).

Clackams, OR Office CS TCR series: 2016=3 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Clackams, OR Office CS falls in its industry

1,605 Cellular phone tower construct establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 28 Cellular phone tower construct employers in Oregon.

Clackams, OR Office CS (65 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Clackams, OR Office CS has fewer employees than the Cellular phone tower construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2021	2.6	0.0	2
2020	3.8	2.5	3
2019	0.0	0.0	0
2018	3.9	2.6	3
2016	3.0	3.0	2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · OR · Clackams

1,605 Cellular phone tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Reed & Reed	WOOLWICH, ME	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Dave's Construction, LLC	SIOUX FALLS, SD	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Tilson Technology Management, Inc. Henrietta	HENRIETTA, NY	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	ANCST - Charleston- SC	NORTH CHARLESTON, SC	2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Bonanza	BONANZA	65 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Holiday Tree Farms, Inc.	CORVALLIS	65 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Pioneer Hi-Bred International, INC	HERMISTON	65 FTE
STATE-SIZE	OR-Salem	SALEM	65 FTE
NAT-TCR	Elster American Meter Company	Nebraska City, NE	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	K055-M001	Newark, OH	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hampton Inn - St. Louis Airport	St. Louis, MO	2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Western Elite Environmental	Lincoln County, NV	2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Mid-Atlantic Transport	Willingboro, NJ	65 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Tulsa FS (IND, CRC-E)	Tulsa, OK	65 FTE
NAT-SIZE	The Wild Palms Hotel	Sunnyvale, CA	65 FTE
NAT-SIZE	GroundsPro Central	West Chester, OH	65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.