Handyman construction service, commercial and institutional building · Arizona

Andrews Construction Inc

Scottsdale, AZ · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Andrews Construction Inc runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Handyman construction service, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Andrews Construction Inc: 5.2 TCR = 180% of Handyman construction service, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Andrews Construction Inc safety composite

Andrews Construction Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Andrews Construction Inc held a steady TCR band

Andrews Construction Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=17.4 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Scottsdale, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 180% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #87/106
  • PHOTO 1107 - BELFOR Oahu HI
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1107 - BELFOR Oahu HI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Andrews Construction Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Andrews Construction Inc averages 5.2 TCR (180% of the Handyman construction service, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Andrews Construction Inc TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=17.4 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Andrews Construction Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Handyman construction service, establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 106 Handyman construction service, employers in Arizona.

Andrews Construction Inc (33 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Andrews Construction Inc
Andrews Construction Inc (33 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Andrews Construction Inc has fewer employees than the Handyman construction service, commercia median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2022 17.4 17.4 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · AZ · Scottsdale

4,692 Handyman construction service, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 531 employers in Scottsdale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1107 - BELFOR Oahu HI 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hayes Construction Company 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simile Construction Service, Inc 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poettker Consrtruction (Southeast) 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Turf Office 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danzeisen Dairy, LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARLINGTON SOUTH 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE TB CONTRACTORS INC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Services LLC 6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Scottsdale 4,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHEA MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS 2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPPORT SERVICES CAMPUS 2,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Skyland Grain, LLC- Spearman Gin 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Simile Construction Service, Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - CLE2 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Agi Ord 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE PACE Supply Sacramento Branch 18 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE TDH Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bowen Resources 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 52-41 Center LLC 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.