Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · Arizona

City of Scottsdale

Scottsdale, AZ · ~4,077 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Scottsdale runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Scottsdale: 6.7 TCR = 209% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Scottsdale safety composite

City of Scottsdale scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Scottsdale: 5.6 → 7.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.69× in 2024

City of Scottsdale's TCR rose 1.8 from 5.6 in 2016 to 7.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Scottsdale, AZ ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 209% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #32/39
  • PHOTO Village of Fox Point
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 488 inj
  • SIZE ~4,077 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Village of Fox Point (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

City of Scottsdale in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Scottsdale averages 6.7 TCR (209% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

City of Scottsdale TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2019=7.1 · 2024=7.4 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Scottsdale falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 39 Executive offices, federal, st employers in Arizona.

City of Scottsdale (4,077 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Scottsdale
City of Scottsdale (4,077 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Scottsdale has more employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.4 4.6 170 17 1
2019 7.1 4.3 170 11 0
2016 5.6 2.4 148 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · AZ · Scottsdale

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 531 employers in Scottsdale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Village of Fox Point 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beltrami County - County Administration Building 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of Shiloh 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuma County Administration 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Arizona Healthcare 4,087 FTE
STATE-SIZE AZ-01 4,098 FTE
STATE-SIZE U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Phoenix B20 Police Dpt 4,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Services LLC 6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHEA MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS 2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPPORT SERVICES CAMPUS 2,800 FTE
CITY-NEAR Talking Stick Resort 2,451 FTE
NAT-TCR Avamere at Rio Rancho 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nelbud 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hajoca 171 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake City,MN - 565 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Dynamics NASSCO 4,077 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6925-WHQ 4,079 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tulane University-Uptown 4,079 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baylor Scott & White Health 4,081 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.