Wheels, motor vehicle, new, merchant wholesalers · Kentucky

Android Industries- Bowling Green

Bowling Green, KY · ~68 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Android Industries- Bowling Green runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Wheels, motor vehicle, new, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Android Industries- Bowling Green: 1.6 TCR = 70% of Wheels, motor vehicle, new, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Android Industries- Bowling Green safety composite

Android Industries- Bowling Green scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2019

Android Industries- Bowling Green injury rate improved

Android Industries- Bowling Green's TCR fell 1.5 from 3.1 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423120 · Bowling Green, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 70% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO Fast Stockton
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fast Stockton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Android Industries- Bowling Green in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Android Industries- Bowling Green averages 1.6 TCR (70% of the Wheels, motor vehicle, new, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Android Industries- Bowling Green TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Android Industries- Bowling Green falls in its industry

950 Wheels, motor vehicle, new, me establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Wheels, motor vehicle, new, me employers in Kentucky.

Android Industries- Bowling Green (68 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Android Industries- Bowling Green
Android Industries- Bowling Green (68 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Android Industries- Bowling Green has more employees than the Wheels, motor vehicle, new, merchant who median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.1 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423120 · KY · Bowling Green

950 Wheels, motor vehicle, new, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fast Stockton 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nestor- Largo Office 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3135 Keystone Automotive Ind. Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3160 Keystone 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Richgrove Tobacco 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jackson Purchase Energy Corporation 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mason Structure 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE R. Brian Morrison 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR Salem Christian Homes, Inc.-Salem South 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Haitai, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wade Manufacturing Company: Rockingham Plant 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Independence 1203 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE TTC 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faf Lck 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Press Distribution Center LDC 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modular Components National Inc. 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.