Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) · New Mexico

Angel Fire Resort Operations

Angel Fire, NM · ~314 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Angel Fire Resort Operations runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) workplace, earning a grade F.

Angel Fire Resort Operations: 6.9 TCR = 230% of Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Angel Fire Resort Operations safety composite

Angel Fire Resort Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Angel Fire Resort Operations: 7.5 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 11.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.08× in 2024

Angel Fire Resort Operations's TCR rose 3.7 from 7.5 in 2016 to 11.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Angel Fire, NM ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 230% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #49/74
  • PHOTO Holiday Inn Los Ange…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~314 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holiday Inn Los Angeles Gateway - Torrance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

Angel Fire Resort Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Angel Fire Resort Operations averages 6.9 TCR (230% of the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Angel Fire Resort Operations TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=5 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.0

Where Angel Fire Resort Operations falls in its industry

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 74 Alpine skiing facilities with employers in New Mexico.

Angel Fire Resort Operations (314 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Angel Fire Resort Operations
Angel Fire Resort Operations (314 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Angel Fire Resort Operations has more employees than the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 0.6 20 0 0
2023 11.3 2.5 27 0 0
2022 5.7 0.8 14 0 0
2021 6.9 2.6 16 0 0
2020 5.0 0.5 11 0 0
2019 4.1 0.5 9 0 0
2018 4.9 0.5 10 0 0
2017 5.4 0.5 12 0 0
2016 7.5 0.9 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NM · Angel Fire

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 3 employers in Angel Fire, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Los Angeles Gateway - Torrance 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SLS Brickell Lux 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residence Inn Flint Grand Blanc 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Denver - South / Park Meadows (HP) 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Albuquerque 314 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3428 314 FTE
STATE-SIZE West : Four Corners 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1357 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Village of Angel Fire 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR 060-ANGEL FIRE 47 FTE
NAT-TCR Tempco 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Rite Store 341 Revere 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Legend at Tulsa Hills 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Peterbilt of Lafayette LLC 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ofs Brands Corporate Office 314 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burr Oak Tool Inc. 314 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omaha, Ne 314 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carilion Athletic Clubs Co. 24 314 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.