Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing · Michigan

Burr Oak Tool Inc.

Sturgis, MI · ~314 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Burr Oak Tool Inc. runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Burr Oak Tool Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 97% of Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Burr Oak Tool Inc. safety composite

Burr Oak Tool Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Burr Oak Tool Inc. injury rate improved

Burr Oak Tool Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 4.4 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Sturgis, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 97% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #57/131
  • PHOTO Steel 21 LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 93 inj
  • SIZE ~314 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Steel 21 LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Burr Oak Tool Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Burr Oak Tool Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (97% of the Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Burr Oak Tool Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Burr Oak Tool Inc. falls in its industry

387 Dies, metalworking (except thr establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 131 Dies, metalworking (except thr employers in Michigan.

Burr Oak Tool Inc. (314 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Burr Oak Tool Inc.
Burr Oak Tool Inc. (314 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Burr Oak Tool Inc. has more employees than the Dies, metalworking (except threading), m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 8 0 0
2023 2.5 0.6 9 0 0
2022 3.8 0.9 13 0 0
2021 2.8 1.4 5 5 0
2020 3.0 1.2 8 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.3 0.5 12 0 0
2017 6.7 1.2 23 0 0
2016 4.4 1.2 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Sturgis

387 Dies, metalworking (except threading), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 35 employers in Sturgis, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Steel 21 LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR UniPunch Products, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comau Dearborn 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Venture Global Engineering IC 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plastipak Packaging- Global Business & Technology Center 314 FTE
STATE-SIZE L3Harris Combat Propulsion Systems 314 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gast Manufacturing 314 FTE
STATE-SIZE OMT-Veyhl USA Corporation 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR AN Sturgis 482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morgan Olson Plant 5 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morgan Olson Plant 1 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1771 311 FTE
NAT-TCR Infinity Images, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HFCS Transport 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Ohio 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gainesville 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Angel Fire Resort Operations 314 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ofs Brands Corporate Office 314 FTE
NAT-SIZE Assisted Home Recovery 314 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles Branch 314 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.