Organo-inorganic compound manufacturing · Louisiana

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington

Sterlington, LA · ~169 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Organo-inorganic compound manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Organo-inorganic compound manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington safety composite

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2022

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington injury rate improved

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.7 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.7 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325199 · Sterlington, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/28
  • PHOTO Solenis LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Solenis LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Organo-inorganic compound manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington falls in its industry

552 Organo-inorganic compound manu establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 28 Organo-inorganic compound manu employers in Louisiana.

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington (169 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington
ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington (169 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5

ANGUS Chemical Company - Sterlington has more employees than the Organo-inorganic compound manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2020 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2018 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2017 1.7 1.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325199 · LA · Sterlington

552 Organo-inorganic compound manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 13 employers in Sterlington, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Solenis LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wiley Companies Walnut 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Materia- Pasadena, CA 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Materia- Huntsville, TX 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway LLC - BASF Chemical - Geismar 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE THE FOUST GROUP, COATING SERVICES 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4818-LA03 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-0618 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advancion - Sterlington, LA 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterlington Critical Access Hospital 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial roofing and Construction 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Roofing & Construction, LLC 65 FTE
NAT-TCR Puckett Machinery Company - Flowood 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HG617 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Location's) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR James Hardie Building Prod. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lutheran Living Senior Campus 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Y Foods, Inc. Northampton 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westminster Bradenton Manor 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden's Foundry & Machine 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.