Industry profile · NAICS 325199

Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 647 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

647
Employers
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
4,030
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing average 2.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
647
employers reporting
4,030
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing sector (NAICS 325199) encompasses 647 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,030 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 14
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Solugen, LLC Slaton, TX F 23.6
Organic Dyes and Pigments -Prov Providence, RI F 21.5
Frontier Scientific Inc. Logan, UT F 20.3
Bio-Cat Microbials Shakopee, MN F 12.2
ICM Products Inc Cassopolis, MI F 12.0
American Biodiesel Inc DBA Community Fuels Stockton, CA F 11.6
Polyventive LLC D130 Calhoun, GA F 10.7
Polyventive LLC Dalton North Dalton, GA F 10.7
Neutron Products, Inc. Dickerson, MD F 9.6
Gabriel Performance Products - HC Harrison City, PA F 8.9
FAR Chemical Palm Bay, FL F 8.8
Polyventive LLC Rome Rome, GA F 8.7
PMC Crystal Lansdale, PA F 8.6
D-Mark Inc. Mt. Clemens, MI F 8.4
Pacific Biodiesel Oahu Kahului, HI F 8.4
Hampford Research Inc Stratford, CT F 8.2
VWR Chemicals Aurora Aurora, OH F 8.0
Pharmachem Laboratories LLC Paterson, NJ F 7.5
Cyalume Specialty Products Bound Brook, NJ F 7.3
ICT Chemicals-Riverside Location Cartersville, GA F 7.3
Italmatch Chemicals SC LLC Bedford Park, IL F 7.2
Manufacturing Coppell, TX F 7.2
Life Sciences : IDT - San Diego 2 San Diego, CA F 7.1
Hero BX Erie, PA F 7.0
Chemol Company Inc. Greensboro, NC F 7.0
Channel Chemical Corporation Gulfport, MS F 6.9
Novozymes Blair Inc. Blair, NE D 6.6
54Vets Stratford, CT D 6.5
Envirotech Chemical Services Helena, AR D 6.3
Life Sciences : IDT - San Diego San Diego, CA D 6.2
Seaboard Energy Kansas, LLC Hugoton, KS D 6.1
Evans Chemetics Waterloo, NY D 6.0
Ajinomoto North America Inc - Eddyville Plant Eddyville, IA D 5.7
Hero BX - Alabama Moundville, AL D 5.7
CRI Tolling Fountain Inn, SC D 5.6
Keaau Keaau, HI D 5.6
Cyalume Specialty Products - Bound Brook Site Bound Brook (Somerset), NJ D 5.5
SACHEM-Austin Austin, TX D 5.5
IsleChem, LLC Grand Island, NY D 5.5
Kansas City Cargill/Paseo Biodiesel Kansas City, MO D 5.5
American Greenfuels LLC New Haven, CT D 5.4
St. Joe Methyl Ester Saint Joseph, MO D 5.3
Koppers Stickney Stickney, IL D 5.3
Huntsman Advanced Materials, LLC (Ashtabula Facility) Ashtabula, OH D 5.3
Dystar LP Reidsville Plant Reidsville, NC D 5.2
Anderson Adrian, MI D 5.1
IDT San Diego San Diego, CA D 5.0
Hero BX - Erie Erie, PA D 5.0
Valtris Specialty Chemcials-- Fort Worth Forth Worth, TX D 5.0
Advanced Biotech Totowa, NJ D 4.9
Page 1 of 14 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.