Distribution of natural gas · Alabama

Anniston Operations Center

Anniston, AL · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anniston Operations Center runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of natural gas workplace, earning a grade D.

Anniston Operations Center: 1.9 TCR = 155% of Distribution of natural gas BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anniston Operations Center safety composite

Anniston Operations Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2016→2024

Anniston Operations Center injury rate improved

Anniston Operations Center's TCR fell 7.0 from 7.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Anniston, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 155% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO Macomb SC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Macomb SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Anniston Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anniston Operations Center averages 1.9 TCR (155% of the Distribution of natural gas BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anniston Operations Center TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Anniston Operations Center falls in its industry

1,153 Distribution of natural gas establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Distribution of natural gas employers in Alabama.

Anniston Operations Center (32 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Anniston Operations Center
Anniston Operations Center (32 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Anniston Operations Center has fewer employees than the Distribution of natural gas median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.3 3.1 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 7.0 3.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · AL · Anniston

1,153 Distribution of natural gas employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 101 employers in Anniston, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Macomb SC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux Falls Service Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AKRON WILBETH SHOP 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Maria Base - Bld: 0433 - 15 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ider Live Operations 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur Fresh Hatchery 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrims Pride - Hatchery 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headland Business Office/Crew Headquarters 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Union 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Union Anniston 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Automotive Components 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Automotive Components Anniston 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Graham Roofing Incorporated 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR City Court 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Concord Complex 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lennar Virginia 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Compressor Technology 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Augusta 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 31800 Industrial 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Airosol Co. Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.