Telecommunications · South Carolina

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC

Greenville, SC · ~49 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications workplace, earning a grade F.

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC: 7.1 TCR = 254% of Telecommunications BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC safety composite

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC: 1.9 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2020

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC's TCR rose 5.7 from 1.9 in 2018 to 7.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 254% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO Grayson Collin Commu…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grayson Collin Communications (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC averages 7.1 TCR (254% of the Telecommunications BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC TCR series: 2018=1.9 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=7.7 · BLS 2.8

Where ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC falls in its industry

1,605 Telecommunications establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Telecommunications employers in South Carolina.

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC (49 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC
ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC (49 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC has fewer employees than the Telecommunications median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 7.7 7.7 4 0 0
2019 11.7 11.7 7 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · SC · Greenville

1,605 Telecommunications employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grayson Collin Communications 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colorado Powerline Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powerline Construction 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC SC Hatchery 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE LANGLEY ELECTRIC OPERATIONS 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broad River Electric Cooperative 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Samet Corporation - Charleston SC 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR RJ Dougherty Associates LLC d/b/a Everglades Boats 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR APC Paper Company of New York, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NurseCore of Denver 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Attleboro Nursing and Rehab Center 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE C2U:C2110 - C2110-C2 Portland 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interstate Battery of San Diego 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noble Wire Products, Inc. d/b/a Madsen Wire Products 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE NFS:NFSG1 - NFSG1-St George Office 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.