Solar Construction and Design · Massachusetts

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive

Marlborough, MA · ~85 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Solar Construction and Design workplace, earning a grade F.

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive: 7.1 TCR = 254% of Solar Construction and Design BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive safety composite

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive: 2.5 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 16.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2024

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive's TCR rose 0.9 from 2.5 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Marlborough, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 254% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #29/31
  • PHOTO Powerline Construction
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Powerline Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive averages 7.1 TCR (254% of the Solar Construction and Design BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=4 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=16.9 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 2.8

Where NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive falls in its industry

1,605 Solar Construction and Design establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 31 Solar Construction and Design employers in Massachusetts.

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive (85 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive
NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive (85 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

NA-US-MA-Marlborough-St. Martin Drive has more employees than the Solar Construction and Design median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 2.6 3 1 0
2023 9.5 6.6 10 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 3 0 0
2021 6.5 5.4 6 0 0
2020 16.9 15.2 10 0 0
2019 6.8 4.5 3 0 0
2018 11.5 9.6 6 0 0
2017 4.0 3.0 4 0 0
2016 2.5 2.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MA · Marlborough

1,605 Solar Construction and Design employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 121 employers in Marlborough, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Powerline Construction 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grayson Collin Communications 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANS:ANGRN - ANGRN-Greenville, SC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SP001 - Tjader - New Richmond 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE IPS - Integrated Project Services, LLC - Cardinal 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE BlueHive/Continental Woodcraft 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 90003930 Canal 3 Simple Cycle Project 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-MA-Wilmington- Research Drive 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon - Marlborough 2,332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Marlborough_MA 2,054 FTE
CITY-NEAR Field 1,438 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hologic : Marlborough Campus 700 FTE
NAT-TCR General City 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Beckman and Gast Co. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lombardi Development Company, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Vincent Tool Technologies Corp 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benton Charter Township 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paulaur Corporation 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rynone Sayre 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royersford 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.