Nursing homes · North Carolina

Anson Health and Rehabilitation

Wadesboro, NC · ~114 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anson Health and Rehabilitation runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade A.

Anson Health and Rehabilitation: 2.9 TCR = 44% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anson Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Anson Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2024

Anson Health and Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Anson Health and Rehabilitation's TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Wadesboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.9 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #79/510
  • PHOTO Chapin Acquisition I…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chapin Acquisition I, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Anson Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anson Health and Rehabilitation averages 2.9 TCR (44% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anson Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Anson Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 510 Nursing homes employers in North Carolina.

Anson Health and Rehabilitation (114 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Anson Health and Rehabilitation
Anson Health and Rehabilitation (114 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Anson Health and Rehabilitation has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2020 6.2 4.9 5 0 0
2019 5.6 5.6 5 0 0
2018 2.7 0.0 2 0 0
2017 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2016 5.1 1.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Wadesboro

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 26 employers in Wadesboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chapin Acquisition I, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside Convalescent Center Saluda 5301 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CREEKSIDE VILLAGE 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Savannah Cottage of Lakeland 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod USA, LLC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cliffside Steam Station 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pike Telecom and Renewables Pennsylvania Statewide Operations 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner Asphalt LLC 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1127 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wade Manufacturing Company: Wadesboro Plant 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus McKinnon - Wadesboro 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations 159 FTE
NAT-TCR Overland Park Sc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR KANKAKEE 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Exit 34A, LLC dba Seaway Inn 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wiese Indianapolis 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southgate Automotive, Inc. 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Arizona, LLC 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oficina Central 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edison 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.