Medical Transport · California

Antelope Valley Communications

Name: Antelope Valley Communications Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Lancaster, CA · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 4.8
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Antelope Valley Communications runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Medical Transport workplace, earning a grade D.

Antelope Valley Communications: 4.8 TCR = 127% of Medical Transport BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Antelope Valley Communications safety composite

Antelope Valley Communications scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers
DART rate: F 9.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Antelope Valley Communications: 0.0 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2020

Antelope Valley Communications's TCR rose 9.7 from 0.0 in 2019 to 9.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · Lancaster, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 127% of ind

DART 9.7 DART
RANK #18/87
PHOTO Medexpress Ambulance…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medexpress Ambulance Service Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Emergency Serv

4.9
This site

4.8
Medexpress Amb

4.8
Vidor

4.8
Delta Response

4.8

What this shows Antelope Valley Communications averages 4.8 TCR (127% of the Medical Transport BLS benchmark).

Antelope Valley Communications TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=9.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Antelope Valley Communications falls in its industry

976 Medical Transport establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 87 Medical Transport employers in California.

Antelope Valley Communications (43 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

Antelope Valley Communications has fewer employees than the Medical Transport median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2020	9.7	9.7	0	4	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · CA · Lancaster

976 Medical Transport employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Medexpress Ambulance Service Inc	ALEXANDRIA, LA	4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Vidor	VIDOR, TX	4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Delta Response Team	APPOMATTOX, VA	4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Emergency Services	HILLSBOROUGH, NC	4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Robert & Sandra Garcia Farming Partnership	LIVINGSTON	43 FTE
STATE-SIZE	ARVIN ADMINISTRATION	ARVIN	43 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Donald W Beeman	WOODLAND	43 FTE
STATE-SIZE	KG Vineyard Management, LLC	LODI	43 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Antelope Valley Union High School District	Lancaster	3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Department of Transportation Facility 549	Lancaster	2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California State Prison-Los Angeles County	Lancaster	1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR	BYD Coach & Bus LLC	Lancaster	679 FTE
NAT-TCR	Park Terrace Assisted Living	Buffalo, MN	4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	FLL - Maintenance	Fort Lauderdale, FL	4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	NBHX Trim USA	Comstock Park, MI	4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	289 Indianapolis, in	Indianapolis, IN	4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Communication Systems, Inc	Allentown, PA	43 FTE
NAT-SIZE	VRS Denver, CO	Westminster, CO	43 FTE
NAT-SIZE	REN264 Metro East Mesa	Phoenix, AZ	43 FTE
NAT-SIZE	CW Egg Products	Fort Recovery, OH	43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.