Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Summerfield of Fresno

Redding, CA · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summerfield of Fresno runs at 689% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Summerfield of Fresno: 26.2 TCR = 689% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summerfield of Fresno safety composite

Summerfield of Fresno scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−38.3

2021→2024

Summerfield of Fresno injury rate improved

Summerfield of Fresno's TCR fell 38.3 from 43.8 in 2021 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 43.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=43.8 · 2023=29.3 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.2 · 689% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #626/635
  • PHOTO Autumn Pointe Assist…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Autumn Pointe Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Summerfield of Fresno in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summerfield of Fresno averages 26.2 TCR (689% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summerfield of Fresno TCR series: 2021=43.8 · 2023=29.3 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Summerfield of Fresno falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #626 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Summerfield of Fresno (42 employees, TCR 26.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Summerfield of Fresno
Summerfield of Fresno (42 employees, TCR 26.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Summerfield of Fresno has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 0.0 1 1 0
2023 29.3 22.8 9 0 0
2021 43.8 43.8 5 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Redding

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Autumn Pointe Assisted Living 26.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Havenwood of Richfield 26.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 407- Heritage Court MC 26.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3178_6157 26.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad H 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJJ Farming, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connell Ranch 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030151-151001 MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
NAT-TCR Tacoma WA Vending 26.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Thrive of Lisle 26.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Western Plus Executive Suites 26.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Highway Department 26.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HBD1 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Living Services Foundation Minneota 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Viking SupplyNet & Fabrication Services - Austin (TX) 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pexco, LLC - Asheboro 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.