Patterns and plans (e.g., clothing patterns) commercial printing (except blueprinting, screen) without publishin · Indiana

Apex Graphics

Elkhart, IN · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Apex Graphics runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Patterns and plans (e.g., clothing patterns) commercial printing (except blueprinting, screen) without publishin workplace, earning a grade A.

Apex Graphics: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Patterns and plans (e.g., clothing patterns) commercial printing (except blueprinting, screen) without publishin BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Apex Graphics safety composite

Apex Graphics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Apex Graphics held a steady TCR band

Apex Graphics's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Elkhart, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/48
  • PHOTO 6704 Louisville
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6704 Louisville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Apex Graphics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Apex Graphics averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Patterns and plans (e.g., clothing patterns) commercial printing (except blueprinting, screen) without publishin BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Apex Graphics TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Apex Graphics falls in its industry

2,001 Patterns and plans (e.g., clot establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 48 Patterns and plans (e.g., clot employers in Indiana.

Apex Graphics (21 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Apex Graphics
Apex Graphics (21 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Apex Graphics has fewer employees than the Patterns and plans (e.g., clothing patte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · IN · Elkhart

2,001 Patterns and plans (e.g., clothing patterns) commercial printing (except blueprinting, screen) without publishin employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 401 employers in Elkhart, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6704 Louisville 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCP Solutions - Jacksonville FL 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillsboro Preprint Facility 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primary Color LLC - Dallas 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eastside Dairy, LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deer Ridge 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana Sow Farm 5 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana Sow Farm 3 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR THOR MOTOR COACH 2,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhart Community Schools 1,892 FTE
CITY-NEAR HRV LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR ADESA Las Vegas 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR James Candy Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Eunice Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SONIFI Solutions, Inc. Sioux Falls Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ERC-Loveland 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Yards 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Umphers Construction 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rovince 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.