Employer
ERC-Loveland
Safety Grade
F
Avg TCR
15.9
per 100 workers
Inspections
4
years on record
Energy assistance programs · Colorado
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

ERC-Loveland

Open-data reference.

LOVELAND, CO | Energy assistance programs

~21 avg employees | 4 years of OSHA data

F
Failing Safety Record
Avg TCR
15.9
per 100 workers/yr
Industry Avg TCR
3.8
BLS benchmark
Total Injuries
11
across all years
Fatalities
0
across all years

ERC-Loveland has an average TCR of 15.9, which is 418% of the industry average (3.8) for Energy assistance programs. This is significantly worse than average.

Safety Insights for ERC-Loveland

ERC-Loveland operates an establishment with approximately 21 full-time equivalent workers in LOVELAND, CO, classified under the Energy assistance programs industry (NAICS 624229). Across 4 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 11 recordable injuries, 1 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 15.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the F letter grade (Failing Safety Record).

Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.8 for Energy assistance programs, ERC-Loveland's workforce experiences 418% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR above the benchmark flags a higher-than-typical risk profile for jobseekers, insurers, and enforcement agencies to examine.

Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 4 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating ERC-Loveland as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from ERC-Loveland's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 624229 — Energy assistance programs.

DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2021)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 43,801 hours worked = 13.70 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
ERC-Loveland (this establishment) 15.88 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 4-year avg
Housing assistance agencies industry avg 3.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 624229
Colorado state avg (all industries) 19.57 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by ERC-Loveland to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 13.7 13.7 3 0 0
2020 45.5 34.1 7 1 0
2019 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ERC-Loveland's safety grade?
ERC-Loveland has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 15.9 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.8 for Energy assistance programs.
How is the safety grade calculated?
Safety grades are calculated by comparing an employer's average Total Case Rate (TCR) — the number of workplace injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers per year — against the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) industry benchmark. Grade A means significantly below average injury rates; grade F means significantly above average.
How many injuries has ERC-Loveland reported?
ERC-Loveland has reported 11 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 4 years of OSHA data (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
All safety data comes from OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA), which collects mandatory establishment-level injury and illness reports from employers with 250+ employees or those in high-hazard industries. Industry benchmarks are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program.

Explore More Safety Data

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial