Annealing metals and metal products for the trade · Michigan

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy

Oak Park, MI · ~16 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Annealing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy: 3.1 TCR = 93% of Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy safety composite

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy held a steady TCR band

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Oak Park, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/43
  • PHOTO BodyCote Haggarty
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~16 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BodyCote Haggarty (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy falls in its industry

248 Annealing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 43 Annealing metals and metal pro employers in Michigan.

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy (16 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy
Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy (16 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy has fewer employees than the Annealing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2022 7.6 7.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · MI · Oak Park

248 Annealing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 37 employers in Oak Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BodyCote Haggarty 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solar Atmospheres Southeast 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Metal Heat Treating, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kowalski Heat Treating Company 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timm Construction Company, LLC 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contour Companies 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Sage Inc. 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE MEI Michigan 16 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brilar LLC 1,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkley Building Blocks, Avery Center 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norup International School 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administrative Office Tyndall Center 782 FTE
NAT-TCR GFL North Wilkesboro 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ARC Abatement Denver 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BDL-GH 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR HC Sedona 3.1 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.