Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Ohio

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc

Cleveland, OH · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc safety composite

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2024

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc injury rate improved

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Cleveland, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/34
  • PHOTO Apollo Heat Treat/Ti…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows General Metal Heat Treating, Inc averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where General Metal Heat Treating, Inc falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 34 Heat treating metals and metal employers in Ohio.

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc (25 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate General Metal Heat Treating, Inc
General Metal Heat Treating, Inc (25 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

General Metal Heat Treating, Inc has fewer employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2022 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2019 10.2 6.8 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.4 0.0 0 1 0
2016 3.2 3.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · OH · Cleveland

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Apollo Heat Treat/Titan Metalurgy 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BodyCote Haggarty 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solar Atmospheres Southeast 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6209 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rittman Orchards 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Convoy Dairy LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kalmbach Swine Management 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nature Pure Farm 2 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Hopewell 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stillwater Milling Ag-Center 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Burlington, Wi 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Metalwest - Ogden 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Columbus Terminal 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE SteelCrest Corporation 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sagebrush Sales 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Fence - Salt Lake City UT 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.