Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Connecticut

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes

Shelton, CT · ~131 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes: 9.3 TCR = 143% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes safety composite

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2016→2024

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes injury rate improved

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes's TCR fell 6.4 from 9.3 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=16.1 · 2021=16.9 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Shelton, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.3 · 143% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #120/258
  • PHOTO Chautauqua Guest Hom…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chautauqua Guest Home #3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes averages 9.3 TCR (143% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=16.1 · 2021=16.9 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=6 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #120 safest of 258 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Connecticut.

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes (131 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes
Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes (131 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Apple Rehab Shelton Lakes has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.9 3 0 0
2023 6.0 4.0 6 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2021 16.9 15.9 5 11 0
2020 16.1 13.9 4 11 0
2019 10.8 8.3 17 0 0
2016 9.3 9.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Shelton

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 111 employers in Shelton, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chautauqua Guest Home #3 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson Manor 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salamanca Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newburgh Operations 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scapa Healthcare 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE M Cubed Technologies 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Y Foods, Inc. Shelton 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Primark Danbury 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR AffinEco, LLC 1,740 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMG 1,487 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSC, Inc. 820 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CT Shelton Far Mill Crossng (5223) 655 FTE
NAT-TCR Newburgh Operations 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CITY Laundering CO 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Konz Wood Products 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnson Thermal Systems 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cal Cartage Warehousing Transloading LLC-375 KENYON RD 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alta Forest Products Shelton 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadow View Nursing Center 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.